Our legal and administrative systems have grown so fragmented that their true structure can now only be mapped using formal reasoning tools — including large language models
There are two issues that have become prominent in the public psyche, specifically among those who’ve become aware of the widespread criminality of our governing, corporate and social institutions: the Law and Artificial Intelligence, A.I.
In August 2022, I wrote about a local co-creative learning group that was formed to research and analyse natural and legislated law in order to develop strategies to reclaim our power that has been denied us through a complex web of Acts, Statutes and Regulations.
Since then, the reach of arbitrary fines, charges and orders has expanded, while the number of challenges to individual cases has multiplied. Illegitimate orders, fines and charges are commonplace and becoming harder to ignore. The legal system is disintegrating.
A.I. is now ubiquitous and is seen by many as yet another tool of our enslavement. Yet, it is only a tool and the more it is used by those seeking to understand the mechanics of our enslavement, the more A.I. will reflect reality. There are structural reasons why this is so. In addition, if A.I. is good at anything, it is logic; logical inconsistency is revealed through astute questioning to prompt A.I. to reveal the reality of any situation or issue.
Increasingly, people are using A.I. to challenge individual cases while injecting foundational, constitutional terms and requirements into the repositories and A.I. searches (in the case of large language models).
Martin Geddes has been using A.I. to help challenge illegitimate orders but has also been using A.I. to reveal the true nature of the legal system in the UK, US and globally. His latest essay makes it clear that the framework underpinning the issuance and enforcement of orders, fines and charges is broken and unconstitutional, in the most fundamental sense.
Modelling the void: a breakthrough in computational political science
Our legal and administrative systems have grown so fragmented that their true structure can now only be mapped using formal reasoning tools — including large language models
Martin’s essay is dense and requires some deep concentration to fully absorb. His article of today explains the problem of court (and all that follows therefrom) legitimacy with a metaphor:
* Lexworthiness: The (new) word that could ground Britain’s “ghost courts” overnight
The new rule that could make unsafe tribunals impossible — and save millions of lives (the invisible, legal kind)
The Judiciary is not independent. Its institutions are corrupt and are weapons/vectors of control in the war on us all. The following correspondence relates to the concerted denial of access to law by the police force to victims of the misleading COVID narratives who had believed what their “trusted” institutions (local and national government, the NHS and many others including doctors, academics and media) were telling them.
* Date: 18 November 2025 at 09:57
Dear Lady Chief Justice, Secretary of State for Justice, Attorney General, Chair of
PACAC and Commissioner Rowley
Re: URGENT – Constitutional Correspondence Requiring Immediate Response
… The matters set out in the attached document are of immediate constitutional and
criminal significance and require your direct personal attention…
extract: The Speirs Directive of 25 January 2022 explicitly
ordered police staff not to accept or record vaccine-
related crime reports. This is established as fact
through documentation held by Police Scotland,
obtained via FOI and corroborated by multiple NPCC
admissions.