On Saturday 20 September 2025, academics and historians are convening under the title
INTERNATIONAL HISTORICAL COMMISSION FOR 9/11 (IHC9).
Purposes: The Purpose of the IHC9 is to discover answers to the key questions still remaining from the tragic events of September 9, 2001.
1: Who authorized, planned and proposed the attacks of 9/11 and 9/9?
2: If the official narrative of Bush is proven false, as seems to be the case, then who else was involved from other agencies and powers?
3: If this was in some way a ‘inside job’ organised by intelligence services, then which intelligence services were responsible?
4: Who financed and funded these terrorist attacks in all details and at all levels of the operation? And what do financial and other records show?
5: Since the chaos of post-9/11 world politics was premised on the official American narrative (i.e. Al Qaeda and Bin Laden were solely responsible), and since this narrative has now been proven false, what are the implications for historians of all countries, cultures and religions? How can we reconstruct a factual and a factual and truthful historical narrative?
On being invited to participate, I responded with the following:
It is encouraging that academics are prepared to explore what has, hitherto, been verboten in academic circles.
However, it is important to understand the historical context of how academia has been colonised and coralled within acceptable tramlines of discourse. Academics who have stepped beyond these boundaries have been vilified, ostracised and forced into academic exile; there are numerous examples relating to a wide variety of issues and events, too many to list.
https://archive.org/details/gulagacademia/page/n10/mode/1upThe publication of Gulag Academia in November 2019 followed the publication of Critical Thinking’s analysis of who rules, how and why in the islamic Economics Journal of King Abdulaziz University in July 2017. That this paper was published, unedited, in an academic journal was a surprising but rare example of academic freedom. Largely ignored since, no-one sought to challenge or refute the analysis, perhaps in the hope that it would remain buried with the passage of time. Now it would seem to be worthy of attention because there is a much wider, historical context to 9/11 that must be understood to make sense of the false flag attacks on 11 September 2001 and all that has followed since.
https://archive.org/details/cm-018/mode/1upIn December 2018, coinciding with the Gilets Jaunes protests in France, Critical Thinking published an article summarising major events instigated and exploited by the cult wedded to the ideology of destruction whose antecedents date back to 458BC.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201101063900/http://freecriticalthinking.org/daily-pickings/2861-political-economy-101-for-yellow-vestsTo focus on 9/11 without exploration of this wider, historical context is inadequate. By isolating issues and events for examination in a binary fashion is how the cult has maintained control and hidden their hand for centuries. Today, however, a growing number of sincere seekers of truth, rather than academic plaudits, are co-creating narratives that accord with reality. The game is up, irrespective of academia’s attempts to suppress truths that render official narratives relating to issues and events, such as 9/11, false.
https://cocreativelearning.org/
The focus of this commission is doomed to exhaust people’s energy and resources with no satisfactory outcome within the foreseeable future. Once we understand that the problem is structural and that attempts to pin accountability on individuals or organisations are fraught with problems, we recognise that a different approach is essential.
We have a choice to make. Do we, collectively, want transformation or “justice”, i.e. retribution/revenge. Arguably, we are all guilty of the many crimes committed against individuals and communities? How so? We are the source of power of the structure; our compliance with and submission to “authority” fuels the abuse, death and destruction.
Simple exchange money got us into this mess and by using it, paying taxes, charges, interest, fines, rents etc., we abuse ourselves and everyone else. Money as the means of organisation has created a global, criminal network; we are all implicated.
However, the way we organise ourselves and handle value is changing.
https://www.outersite.org/a-tale-of-two-value-systems/
The transition to a new organisational paradigm is underway, supported by spiritual evolution.
https://bernhardguenther.substack.com/p/time-of-transition-the-battle-for
The many academics invited to participate in the 9/11 commission could apply their energy and resources to far greater effect, to smooth and aid the transition.
Judgement is not our call. There is a much higher power that exercises judgement.
Successful transformation is the prize; that is where we need to focus our attention.