I’ve had a response from my local doctors’ surgery to my recent enquiry which is replicated halfway down this page.
The practice replied on on Thu 8 Oct at 15:22.
Dear Mr Menzies,
Thank you for your enquiry.
In response to your query about the remuneration for the flu vaccination please be advised that we receive payments only from NHS North London Clinical Commissioning Group.
The national arrangements for providing vaccines are set out in the additional services section of the Statement of Financial Entitlements (SFE). You can also find them in more accessible form on the British Medical Association website: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-…
To address your second question: death is not listed as a potentially undesirable effect of the vaccine administration. For your information – your age group – nationally is entitled this year to receive Fluad aTIV, Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe made by Seqirus UK Limited. You can further research the vaccine by checking: https://www.medicines.org.uk/e…
And in terms of your last question, we recognise the corealation between those two variables. However, we also believe that in this particular case “correlation implies causation” is an example of a questionable-cause logical fallacy in which, two events occurring together are taken to have established a cause-and-effect relationship.
Please rest assured that the safety and well-being of our patients is our primary objective.
I hope that above arguments will convince you to book your flu vaccination appoinment. We look forward to hearing from you shortly.
To which I’ve responded:
Many thanks for your response.
- “The national arrangements for providing vaccines are set out in the additional services section of the Statement of Financial Entitlements (SFE)”. Please will you let me know the NHS North London Clinical Commissioning Group financial officer’s name with whom you liaise, so that I can ask where the money for £10.06 per vaccination comes from. An additional question for you is. Do you pay for each dose out of this amount?
- I understand that each dose contains an information insert and some popular flu vaccine manufacturers admit a mortality rate of 0.7%. Other evidence suggests that mortality is much higher and permanent damage from side effects is evident. The list of side effects for Fluad aTIV is long and complex and is based on a limited study of 7532 subjects – abstracted studies provide a narrow perspective that invariably proves an understatement of reality, particularly when those conducting such studies have a vested interest in downplaying negative results.
- “Correlation is not causation” and that is as much a lesson for those promoting the COVID-19 hysteria as anyone. The flawed PCR tests aren’t fit for diagnostics, as explained by the test’s inventor, Kerry Mullis https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/. In spite of false positive rates rendering the results meaningless, the reported “positive” tests are being used to ramp up the fear, in spite of them having more correlation with the number of people tested than with those sick or dying. There is no correlation between deaths and “positive” cases.
However, where there is an obvious correlation, it is cause for further investigation, not dismissal with a trite saying. One place to start is past alleged pandemics such as Spanish Flu. From the extensively referenced Virus Mania, Chapter 7, which I commend to you and your colleagues,
“There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were those they had been vaccinated against. One soldier who had returned from overseas in 1912 told me that the army hospitals were filled with cases of infantile paralysis [polio] and he wondered why grown men should have an infant disease. Now, we know that paralysis is a common after-effect of vaccine poisoning. Those at home didn’t get the paralysis until after the world-wide vaccination campaign in 1918.”
Furthermore, vaccines are alleged to prevent the spread of disease person to person but scientists at the time couldn’t infect healthy subjects who ingested mucus from those with acute symptoms:
“Navy doctors collected the mucus from men who were desperately ill from the flu, gathering thick viscous secretions from their noses and throats. They sprayed mucus from flu patients into the noses and throats of some men and dropped it into other men’s eyes. In one attempt, they swabbed mucus from the back of the nose of a man with the flu and then directly swabbed one patient’s nasal septum and rubbed it directly onto the nasal septum of one of the volunteers.
“Trying to simulate what happens naturally when people are exposed to flu victims, the doctors took ten of the volunteers onto the hospital ward where men were dying of the disease. The sick men lay huddled on their narrow beds, burning with fever, drifting in and out of sleep in a delirium. The ten healthy men were given their instructions: each was to walk up to the bed of a sick man and draw near him, lean into his face, breathe in his fetid breath, and chat with him for five minutes. To be sure that the healthy man had had a full exposure to the sick man’s disease, the sick man was to exhale deeply while the healthy man drew the sick man’s breath directly into his own lungs. Finally, the flu victim coughed five times in the volunteer’s face.
“Each healthy volunteer repeated these actions with ten different flu patients. Each flu patient had been seriously ill for no more than three days-a period when the virus or whatever it was that was causing the flu should still be around in his mucus, in his nose, in his lungs.
“But not a single healthy man got sick.”
A comparable experiment, carried out under much stricter conditions, took place in San Francisco, with 50 imprisoned sailors. But, once again, the results did not correspond with what the doctors had expected:
“Scientists were stunned. If these healthy volunteers did not get infected with influenza despite doctors’ best efforts to make them ill, then what was causing this disease? How, exactly, did people get the flu?”
The correlation between flu vaccinations and alleged COVID-19 deaths is surely worthy of investigation?
As ever, feel free to plagiarise the above. We need to open up the conversation on viruses and vaccines because it is another product of structure. Everyone in the compartmentalised chain is incentivised to promote mass vaccination and anyone who raises their head above the parapet to resist is heavily penalised.
However, the more people who dissent, the easier it becomes for others. That process has started with many in the medical profession leading the way. Nonetheless, most of these also subscribe to the fabricated but discredited single viral cause of disease. Doctors need to co-create their research and analysis of viruses and vaccines rather than accept what they are told by criminal hierarchy. Then this madness will cease.
I won’t be booking a flu jab anymore than I would readily imbibe…
“Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder’s fork, and blind-worm’s sting,
Lizard’s leg, and howlet’s wing,–
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.”
Macbeth (IV, i, 14-15)